# 23160700095459
Unscheduled inspection
Start date: 2016-08-26, end date: 2016-09-22, duration: —
Authority: Upravlenie Federalnoi sluzhby po nadzoru v sfere zaschity prav potrebitelei i blagopoluchiya cheloveka po Krasnodarskomu krayu
Purpose of inspection: the real test is conducted to check the treatment C M from 15082016г Rin 186 in which he indicates that I found on Craigslist housing for rent for rent at g Anapa ul Толстого49 by Calling the phone she agreed to rent an apartment on the 3rd day the rent was 5400 RUB but booking have to make a prepayment in the amount of 3,500 rubles G M refused to make a prepayment Later she got a call from another phone number and the girl reported that a realtor is a real estate agent and that the owners of the apartment she found doing the discount and the full amount of the payment for accommodation will be 4500 rubles For to gr M not worried about where will the money callers will be sent by e-mail a sample contract And the phone number of the owners of the apartment will provide immediately after the prepayment agreement Sample was sent under this agreement, the operator is LLC "Specavtotrans" g Moskva ul Planetary D22, No specific figures about the cost of services in this draft Treaty was not On the phone g M explained that 3500rub she needs to make "online" translation into their wallet as payment and 1000 rubles will have to pay the owner of the apartment at check-Gr M made in advance then to her room received SMS that it has successfully paid for the services of the Agency "Domino" for a period of 1 month and a link to a project of another dogovoreno dogovorite paid services 2387106 from 09082016г G M began to receive SMS with addresses and phone numbers of those who rents an apartment in g Anapa, But I need the phone number was not sent G M believes that was deceived by the Deception imposed on the service in which she didn't need right apartment she found herself and the other to find she could not have believed that she intends not reported the full cost of services though she asked several times For calls demanding the return of money C M was denied on August 22 g M filed a claim for termination of the agreement and the return of the amount spent to the email address specified confrn4ru her statement when talking on telefonaktiebolag thinks that violated her rights and asked to take merisatama of this review are very strong.